1. Therapist Support
  2. Resources
  3. Practice

California · hiring an associate

Hiring your first associate, and the one question you cannot get wrong

An associate costs about 1.10× their salary in payroll loading, and one hour a week of your own billable time on top — which is the cost everybody forgets. Here is the full loaded number, the session count at which they start paying for themselves, and the classification question that has exactly one lawful answer.

Practice13 min read
Last checked7 August 2026All updates →
Verified to source

Every figure on this page was re-checked against the statute, schedule or filing it cites.

In short

Should I hire an associate?

The loaded cost, the break-even caseload, and the classification rule

14 sessions a week
14 sessionsa week before an associate breaks even

Where this starts: a full caseload and a waiting list

You are booked. People are waiting three weeks, then six, and some of them stop waiting. You have already raised your fee once and you are not sure you want to raise it again. So you start thinking about an associate — a registered AMFT who can see the clients you cannot, under your supervision, while they gather the 3,000 hours they need for licensure.[19]

Almost everything written about this is either a legal explainer with no numbers in it or a motivational post about “scaling”. What is missing is the arithmetic: what one associate really costs once payroll taxes and insurance are in, what they bring in, and where the line between those two crosses. There is also one legal question underneath all of it that has a single lawful answer in California, and getting it wrong is expensive in a way the other mistakes are not.

This page does three things, in order. It settles the classification question. It builds the full loaded cost of an associate on a stated salary of $70,000. Then it works out how many sessions a week that associate has to carry before they stop costing you money.

The classification question, answered before you ask it

The question therapists ask first is whether an associate can be a 1099 independent contractor. It is asked because contracting looks simpler: no payroll registration, no employer taxes, no workers’ compensation policy. The answer in California is no, and it is no twice over — once under employment law and again, more directly, under the Board’s own statute.

Start with employment law. Since AB 5, worker status in California is decided by the ABC test, now codified at Labor Code §2775. A person providing labor for pay is an employee unless the hiring entity proves all three of the following.[1]

  • Prong A. The person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in performing the work, both under the contract and in fact.
  • Prong B. The person performs work outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.
  • Prong C. The person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade of the same nature as the work performed.

An associate in your practice fails all three. Prong A fails because California defines clinical supervision as control: “the term ‘supervision’ means responsibility for, and control of, the quality of mental health and related services provided by the supervisee.”[5] You cannot be the supervisor of record and also be hands-off; the statute makes those the same act. Prong B fails because psychotherapy performed for a psychotherapy practice is the usual course of the business, not outside it. Prong C fails because an associate is by definition not permitted to practice independently at all.

Some professions escape the ABC test. Labor Code §2783 sends a list of licensed occupations back to the older, more flexible Borello test — and that list names psychologists, along with physicians, dentists, podiatrists, veterinarians, lawyers, architects, engineers, private investigators and accountants.[2] It does not name marriage and family therapists, clinical social workers or professional clinical counselors. This is worth being precise about, because it is the source of a lot of confused advice: a licensed psychologist contracting with a health care entity has an argument here. An LMFT does not, and an AMFT certainly does not. The separate professional-services exemption at Labor Code §2778 is a closed list too — marketing, graphic design, grant writing, fine art, travel agents, freelance writing, estheticians, appraisers, foresters — and psychotherapy is not on it.[3]

That is the employment-law answer. The Board of Behavioral Sciences gives a shorter one:

“A trainee, associate, or applicant for licensure shall only perform mental health and related services as an employee or volunteer, and not as an independent contractor. … A trainee, associate, or applicant for licensure shall not perform any services or gain any experience within the scope of practice of the profession … as an independent contractor.”

Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §4980.43.3(a) — see source [4]

There is no ambiguity to work with. The same section adds three things that close the usual workarounds. An employed associate must hand the Board copies of their W-2 for every year of experience claimed.[4] An associate may not take money from clients at all and may only be paid by their employer — so “the associate collects the fee and pays me a percentage” is unlawful on its face. And an associate may have no proprietary interest in the employer’s business and may not rent space, pay for furnishings or equipment, or cover any of the employer’s obligations — so the sublet-a-room model that works for two licensed therapists is not available with an associate.[4]

The Board makes the supervisor personally attest to it. On the Supervision Agreement, form 37M-300, which supervisor and supervisee must complete within 60 days of starting, item 16 has the supervisor affirm that they “shall ensure that the supervisee is employed as a W-2 employee or a volunteer, and not as an independent contractor”.[18]

What happens to the hours. This is the part that makes misclassification worse for an associate than for almost any other misclassified worker. Hours gained as a contractor are not creditable experience, because the statute says experience may not be gained as a contractor. And the associate cannot document them anyway: the Board asks for W-2s, and a 1099 is not one. Two years of work can evaporate. The Board can also audit. If those hours are more than six years old by the time a clean application is finally filed, they expire on their own.[19]

What it costs you. Willful misclassification — voluntarily and knowingly avoiding employee status — carries a civil penalty of $5,000 to $15,000 per violation, rising to $10,000 to $25,000 per violation where there is a pattern or practice, on top of any other penalty, plus a public notice you must post on your own website for a year.[6] Anyone who advises you to do it for money is jointly and severally liable with you, unless they are your employee or a lawyer giving legal advice.[7] And because a misclassified worker was an employee all along, you had no workers’ compensation for them: failing to secure coverage is a misdemeanour punishable by up to a year in county jail or a fine of double the premium you avoided, and not less than $10,000.[11]

Where the law is genuinely unsettled, this page will say so. Here it is not. Employ them, or take a volunteer.

What an employee actually costs in California

Now the arithmetic. Take an associate on a stated salary of $70,000, full time, working the whole calendar year. Every rate below is the published 2026 figure. The wage bases matter as much as the rates: California’s unemployment taxes stop at the first $7,000 of pay, so on a professional salary they are a rounding error, while Social Security and Medicare run on every dollar.

LineRate and base (2026)Cost to you
Salarystated$70,000
Employer Social Security6.2% to $184,500$4,340
Employer Medicare1.45%, no cap$1,015
FUTA (federal unemployment)2.1% on first $7,000$147
California UI, new employer3.4% on first $7,000$238
ETT (employment training tax)0.1% on first $7,000$7
California SDI1.3%, no wage cap — withheld from the employee$0
Workers’ compensationat the statewide average advisory rate, $1.65 per $100$1,155
Associate’s malpractice policy, if you pay itpublished rate under $100 a year$100
Total employer cost$77,002
Multiplier on salary1.10×

Employer Social Security and Medicare are 6.2% and 1.45%, and the Social Security wage base for 2026 is $184,500, which a $70,000 salary does not reach — so the 7.65% applies to the whole salary and comes to $5,355.[9] California’s new-employer UI rate is 3.4% for the first two to three years, the ETT rate is 0.1%, and both stop at $7,000 of wages per employee per year.[8]

The FUTA line needs a footnote of its own. Federal unemployment tax is nominally 6.0% with a 5.4% credit, so 0.6% — but California has an outstanding federal unemployment loan, and states that do not repay lose part of that credit. For tax year 2025 the U.S. Department of Labor certified a 1.2 percentage point credit reduction for California, making the real rate 1.8% and the bill $126 per employee.[26] The EDD publishes 2.1% for 2026 and labels it a projection, because the 2026 reduction is not certified until November 2026. The table uses EDD’s 2.1% — $147 — and you should treat it as the ceiling for the year, not a settled number.[8]

SDI is the line most articles get wrong. California’s State Disability Insurance rate for 2026 is 1.3%, and since 1 January 2024 there is no taxable wage limit at all — the cap was removed, so it runs on every dollar of pay. On $70,000 that is $910 a year. But SDI is withheld from the employee. It is not an employer contribution, it does not appear in your loaded cost, and quoting it as a cost of hiring is simply an error.[8] It matters to your associate’s take-home, and it matters a great deal if you are paying yourself an S-corporation salary — see the SDI cost of an S-corp salary.

Workers’ compensation is the one number nobody can publish honestly. California does not set workers’ comp rates; the Insurance Commissioner adopts an advisory pure premium rate and each carrier files its own. The advisory rate adopted for policies incepting on or after 1 September 2026 averages $1.65 per $100 of payroll, a 6.6% increase on 2025.[10] That average is dragged up by construction and agriculture; an office-based mental health practice classifies far below it, so the $1,155 in the table is a ceiling and a real quote should come in lower. Two warnings. Carriers apply a minimum annual premium, so on a single employee your quote may not scale down proportionally. And coverage is not optional: securing it is what §3700.5 is about.[11]

Malpractice. An associate carries their own professional liability policy, and pre-licensed rates are genuinely small — CPH publishes rates “less than $100 per year” for a post-master’s MFT associate under supervision.[12] What is not published anywhere is the cost of adding an entity or supervisory endorsement to your policy, because it is quoted individually. Ask your carrier before you hire, not after. Supervising someone is a new exposure on your license, not just on theirs.

So the honest headline is that the loading is about 10% — well below the figures general small-business guides quote, because those are written around health insurance, retirement matching and state unemployment systems with high wage bases. California’s payroll taxes are cheap on a professional salary precisely because they stop at $7,000.

What the table leaves out, deliberately. Five days or 40 hours of paid sick leave per year, which every California employer must provide and which is a real cost if it is used.[25] Any holiday or vacation you offer. Health insurance, if you offer it — you are not required to at this size, and it would be the single largest line if you did. A retirement plan, or registration with CalSavers if you do not sponsor one: the mandate now reaches employers with even one employee, and the registration deadline for employers with one to four employees was 31 December 2025, with penalties of $250 per eligible employee after 90 days and a further $500 after 180.[24] An extra clinician seat on your practice-management software. And the biggest omission of all, which the next section is about: your own time.

What an associate earns you

Here is the side of the ledger that justifies the hire, with the cost everybody leaves out put back in.

The Board requires at least one hour of direct supervisor contact in every week for which experience is credited, in each work setting. If the associate performs more than ten hours of direct clinical counseling in a week, they must receive one additional hour for that setting.[13] A full-time associate is therefore two hours of your week, every week they work. If you would otherwise have seen clients in those hours, that is not an inconvenience; it is revenue you gave up, and it belongs in the arithmetic at your own rate.

Take the following, all stated so you can substitute your own. The associate works 48 weeks a year. They collect $150 a session — associates are usually seen at a lower fee than you charge. Your own rate is $200 an hour. Two supervision hours a week for 48 weeks at $200 is $19,200 of your billable time. Added to the loaded salary of $77,002, an associate carrying a real caseload costs you $96,202 a year.

Divide that by what one weekly session slot brings in over a year — 48 × $150 = $7,200 — and the break-even is 13.36 sessions a week. Round up, because you cannot hire a third of a session:

14 sessions a weekwhere a $70,000 associate stops costing you money

At 13 sessions a week you are down $2,602 on the year. At 14 sessions a week you are up $4,598. That is a knife edge, and it is the real reason first hires disappoint: an associate at ten or twelve sessions a week is not a slow start, it is a loss. The number moves fast in your favor after that, because every session above break-even is almost pure margin — the salary and the supervision hour are both fixed.

At 25 sessions a week the same associate collects $180,000 and leaves you $83,798. That is the case for doing this. It is also worth seeing what it means for them: $70,000 spread over 25 sessions a week for 48 weeks is $58.33 a session, or 39% of what the client pays. Whether that is fair is a judgment, not a calculation, but you should make it knowing the figure.

Two adjustments before you trust this on your own practice. First, the $150 is what you collect, not what you bill — late cancelations, no-shows and insurance write-offs all sit between the two, and if your collection rate is 90% then your effective session value is $135 and break-even moves to 15 sessions a week. Second, filling those 14 slots is its own project; the referral and funnel maths is where you find out whether the waiting list you have is really 14 sessions a week deep, or whether it is nine people who would all rather see you. Run both sides on your own figures in the practice simulator before you write a job advert.

Salary or a percentage split

Most California group practices do not pay a salary. They pay a percentage of the fee collected — commonly quoted as 60/40 or 55/45 in the practice’s favor for an associate. It is worth being clear about what that changes and what it does not.

It does not change the employment question. A split is a method of calculating wages, not a form of engagement. The associate is still a W-2 employee, you still run payroll, you still carry workers’ compensation, and the associate still may not take money from a client — the practice collects the fee and pays the associate a wage computed as a share of it.[4] Anyone who tells you a split makes someone a contractor has told you something the statute contradicts in one sentence.

What it changes is who carries the risk of an empty diary. Here is the same associate under both models, at a thin caseload and a full one, with the same $150 collected fee, 48 weeks and $19,200 of your supervision time in both columns.

Model, at $150 collected per session14 sessions a week25 sessions a week
Collected by the practice$100,800$180,000
Salary model — associate’s gross pay$70,000$70,000
Salary model — what you keep$4,598$83,798
40% split — associate’s gross pay$40,320$72,000
40% split — what you keep$37,039$81,612

At a full caseload the two models land within about $2,000 of each other, and the salary is slightly better for you — you have capped the associate’s pay while their production kept rising. At a thin caseload they are not remotely comparable: the split leaves you $37,039 ahead where the salary leaves you $4,598. Push it further and the point is unmissable. At four sessions a week the associate needs only one supervision hour, so your time cost falls to $9,600; the split still leaves you about $6,100 in the black, while the salary leaves you $57,802 in the red.

That is the whole trade. A salary buys certainty for the associate and hands the risk of an unfilled caseload to you — which is defensible if the waiting list is yours and the referrals are yours, because then the risk is yours to manage. A split hands that risk to a person early in their career who cannot generate their own referrals, cannot advertise independently, and has a 3,000-hour clock running.[19] If you use a split, the honest version comes with a floor, or a guaranteed minimum for the first six months while the caseload fills.

Two legal edges on split pay. Commission-style wages still have to clear the minimum wage for every hour worked, and hours worked include notes, supervision, admin and no-show time, none of which a per-session split pays for. California’s minimum wage is $16.90 an hour from 1 January 2026.[23] An associate at four sessions a week on a 40% split earns $11,520 a year; if they are genuinely working fifteen hours a week, minimum wage on 720 hours is $12,168 and you owe the difference. And do not assume an associate is exempt from overtime. Exemption turns on the work and on licensure, and a registered associate is not a licensee; ask an employment lawyer before you treat anyone as exempt, and budget as though they are not.

What supervision requires of you

Before any of the above is available to you, you have to be eligible to supervise. The requirements are specific and several of them take time to satisfy, so read this before you post the job.

  • Two years licensed, in the last five. You must have held an active license — LMFT, LPCC, LCSW, licensed psychologist, licensed educational psychologist, or a board-certified psychiatrist — for at least two years within the five-year period immediately preceding any supervision.[15]
  • Two years of practice, in the same window. You must also have actually practiced psychotherapy or provided clinical supervision for at least two years within that five-year period. Holding the license is not enough.[15]
  • 15 hours of supervision training. Taken within two years before you commence supervising, or within 60 days after. If you have not supervised for two years, six hours within 60 days of resuming. Then a minimum of six hours in every renewal period while you are supervising.[16]
  • No dual relationships. You may not supervise a spouse, domestic partner or relative, anyone you have provided therapy to, or anyone with whom you have a relationship that undermines the supervision.[15]

The weekly hour, and the ratio rules. One hour of direct supervisor contact in each week experience is credited, in each setting; a second hour in any week the associate exceeds ten direct clinical hours in that setting; and no more than six hours of supervision credited in any single week. Of the 104 weeks minimum, at least 52 must be individual or triadic supervision. Group supervision counts as two hours of contact for one hour of credit, with no more than eight people in the group.[13] That last rule is how a practice with two or three associates gets its per-associate time cost down: the second required hour can be group, shared across everyone. At least 52 of the weeks still need individual or triadic supervision, and that hour cannot be shared.

The cap. In a private practice, you may not be the individual or triadic supervisor for more than six people who are not fully licensed at any one time.[14] That is the structural ceiling on this whole model for a solo owner — six associates, and then you need another supervisor.

You must be inside the business. An associate employed in a private practice or professional corporation must be supervised by someone who is employed by, contracted by, or an owner of that employer — and who either sees clients for that employer or has a written contract giving them the same access to clinical records as employees have, with the clients’ written authorization to release those records.[14] An outside supervisor is possible; it is paperwork, not a shortcut.

The paperwork, and the deadline. Within 60 days of supervision commencing, you and the associate must complete the Supervision Agreement (form 37M-300) under penalty of perjury and collaboratively develop a written supervisory plan setting out the goals and objectives of the supervision.[18] Within the same 60 days you must file a supervisor self-assessment report with the Board. You must also give the associate written crisis-contact procedures before supervision starts, assess in writing whether videoconference supervision is appropriate for that person, and complete a written assessment of their strengths and limitations at least annually and at the end.[17]

What you are actually taking on. Supervision is defined as responsibility for and control of the quality of the services the supervisee provides — ensuring the extent and kind of counseling matches their training, monitoring their assessment, diagnosis and treatment decisions, reviewing their notes, ensuring their compliance with the law, and addressing clinical dynamics as they arise. Consultation and peer discussion are explicitly not supervision.[5] If your associate harms a client, that is your license in the room too. And if you decide to stop signing for someone’s hours, you owe them at least one week’s written notice — and you must still sign for hours already worked in good faith under supervision you actually provided.[17]

If you want the associate’s view of the same machinery — what the 3,000 hours are made of and how long they take — see the 3,000-hour breakdown and the licensure route. Knowing what your associate is counting is most of what makes you a useful supervisor.

Sole proprietor, or a professional corporation

You do not need to incorporate to hire someone. A sole proprietor can be an employer: you register with the EDD, you get a payroll account, you issue a W-2. Nothing in the Board’s rules requires the employer of an associate to be a corporation. What is required is that the setting “lawfully and regularly provides mental health counseling or psychotherapy” and provides oversight to ensure the experience and supervision rules are met[4] — which in a private practice means the practice belongs to a licensed clinician.

What changes when you incorporate is liability and tax, not eligibility. A sole proprietorship gives you no separation between the practice’s obligations and your personal assets, and an employee is a new source of obligations — wage claims, payroll liabilities, the acts of someone else practicing under your supervision. That is the argument for a California professional corporation, which for an MFT is a marriage and family therapy corporation. It is also the point at which the third option most of America uses stops being available: the Corporations Code forbids a limited liability company from rendering professional services in this state, which is why you will not see one recommended anywhere on this site.[21] The long version is in the entity article, and the setup and running costs are in what incorporating actually costs.

Who may own it. A professional corporation must be owned by licensed people, and §13401.5 sets out which other licensees may hold shares in each kind. For a marriage and family therapist corporation, the permitted co-owners are physicians and surgeons, psychologists, clinical social workers, registered nurses, chiropractors, acupuncturists, naturopathic doctors, professional clinical counselors and midwives.[20] The statute caps them: the sum of all shares owned by those other licensees may not exceed 49%, and their number may not exceed the number of MFTs holding shares. The familiar “at least 51% MFT-owned” is the arithmetic complement of that cap rather than a quoted figure, but it lands in the same place.[20]

The part that catches people: your associate cannot be a shareholder. They are not licensed, so they cannot own any of it — and separately, an associate may have no proprietary interest in their employer’s business at all.[4] A partnership track for a promising associate is a conversation for after they are licensed, and it needs to be documented as such rather than promised loosely in a job offer.

What to have in writing before day one

In rough order, and none of it optional.

  • Confirm the associate registration. Check the number on the Board’s license lookup yourself. An applicant may not be employed or volunteer in a private practice or professional corporation until the Board has issued the registration — not when they applied, when it is issued.[4]
  • Register as an employer with the EDD. Required within 15 days of paying more than $100 in wages in a calendar quarter. Then report the hire to the New Employee Registry within 20 days of their start date.[22]
  • Bind workers’ compensation before the first shift. Not the first payroll run — the first hour worked. The penalty for the gap is a minimum $10,000 fine and it is a misdemeanour.[11]
  • Sort your own supervisor eligibility. Two years licensed and practicing within the last five, and the 15 hours of supervision training done or scheduled inside the 60-day window.[16]
  • The Supervision Agreement, form 37M-300, plus a written supervisory plan. Within 60 days of starting, signed under penalty of perjury — along with your supervisor self-assessment to the Board, and the written crisis-contact procedures the associate must have before the first client.[18]
  • A written employment agreement. Salary or the split formula, hours, the fact that they are a W-2 employee and not a contractor, who owns the client relationship, what happens to the caseload if they leave, and the 40 hours of paid sick leave you must provide. The Labor Code §2810.5 wage notice goes to them at hire.[25]
  • Malpractice, both sides. Their own policy in force — under $100 a year at published pre-licensed rates — and a call to your carrier about the supervisory and entity exposure on yours.[12]
  • CalSavers, or a plan of your own. The mandate applies at one employee, and the penalties are $250 per eligible employee after 90 days of notice and a further $500 after 180.[24]

The verdict. Hire when you have a durable waiting list you can hand over — not a busy month, a pattern — and it is deep enough to put 14 sessions a week in front of one person within about three months. Hire when you are already eligible to supervise, or willing to do the 15 hours before you start. Hire when you actually want the job of supervising, which is a different job from seeing clients and is the one you will be doing for two hours a week regardless of whether you enjoy it.

Do not hire because your diary is full. If the constraint is that you personally are booked, the cheaper answer is almost always to raise your own rate. A $20 increase across 25 sessions a week for 48 weeks is $24,000 straight to profit, with no payroll registration, no workers’ compensation policy, no 60-day paperwork deadline and no second person’s license resting on your judgment. An associate has to reach 14 sessions a week merely to break even and about 17 to match that rate rise — but at 25 sessions they return $83,798, three and a half times over, which is precisely why the model exists. Get to the honest answer by putting your own fee, your own caseload and a realistic first-year associate volume into the simulator and looking at both lines at once. Then talk to an accountant about payroll and an employment lawyer about the contract, because the two mistakes in this article that actually cost real money — misclassification and an uninsured employee — are both cheaper to avoid than to fix.

Run this on your own rate and your own caseload

The simulator takes your fee, your session volume and your expenses and shows profit before and after a hire. Change the associate’s salary or the sessions they carry and watch the break-even move.

Open the calculator →

Sources

  1. Cal. Labor Code §2775 — the ABC test, codified from AB 5 and Dynamex
  2. Cal. Labor Code §2783 — occupations sent back to Borello; psychologists are listed, MFTs, LCSWs and LPCCs are not
  3. Cal. Labor Code §2778 — the closed “professional services” list; psychotherapy is absent from it
  4. Cal. Business & Professions Code §4980.43.3 — employee or volunteer only; W-2 evidence; no fees from clients; no proprietary interest
  5. Cal. Business & Professions Code §4980.43.1 — defines supervision as responsibility for, and control of, the supervisee’s services
  6. Cal. Labor Code §226.8 — civil penalties for willful misclassification, and the website notice
  7. Cal. Labor Code §2753 — joint and several liability for anyone paid to advise the misclassification
  8. EDD, 2026 Federal and State Payroll Taxes (DE 202, Rev. 15, 1-26) — UI 3.4% new employer and ETT 0.1% on $7,000; SDI 1.3% with no wage limit; FUTA shown as 2.1% and marked projected
  9. Social Security Administration, Contribution and Benefit Base — the 2026 taxable maximum is $184,500
  10. California Department of Insurance, news release 024-2026 (13 July 2026) — advisory pure premium rate of $1.65 per $100 of payroll from 1 September 2026, up 6.6%
  11. Cal. Labor Code §3700.5 — failing to secure workers’ compensation is a misdemeanour, minimum $10,000 fine
  12. CPH & Associates, malpractice insurance for post-master’s MFT associates under supervision — published rates of less than $100 per year
  13. Cal. Business & Professions Code §4980.43.2 — the weekly hour, the extra hour above ten direct clinical hours, and the group and individual ratios
  14. Cal. Business & Professions Code §4980.43.4 — the supervisor’s relationship to the employer, and the six-supervisee cap
  15. Cal. Business & Professions Code §4980.03(g) — who qualifies as a supervisor: two years licensed and two years practicing within the last five
  16. Cal. Code Regs. tit. 16 §1834 — 15 hours of supervision training, and six hours per renewal period while supervising
  17. Cal. Code Regs. tit. 16 §1833.1 — supervisor duties, annual assessments, crisis procedures, and the one week’s notice rule
  18. BBS Supervision Agreement, form 37M-300 — the 60-day deadline, the supervisory plan, and item 16 — the W-2 attestation
  19. Cal. Business & Professions Code §4980.43 — 3,000 hours over at least 104 weeks, and the six-year expiry on hours
  20. Cal. Corporations Code §13401.5 — subdivision (g) is the marriage and family therapist corporation; other licensees are capped at 49%
  21. Cal. Corporations Code §17701.04 — subdivision (e) bars a limited liability company from rendering professional services in California
  22. EDD, Am I Required to Register as an Employer? — register within 15 days of paying more than $100 in wages in a quarter; new hires reported within 20 days
  23. Cal. Dept. of Industrial Relations, Official Notice MW-2026 — $16.90 an hour from 1 January 2026, for employers of every size
  24. CalSavers, employer information — the mandate at one employee, the 31 December 2025 deadline for one to four, and the $250 and $500 penalties
  25. Cal. Dept. of Industrial Relations, Paid Sick Leave FAQ — 40 hours or five days a year since 1 January 2024, and the §2810.5 employee notice
  26. Notice of FUTA Credit Reductions Applicable for 2025, 91 Fed. Reg. (12 January 2026) — California certified at a 1.2 point credit reduction for 2025, making the effective FUTA rate 1.8%

Every figure here is either computed by the calculator linked above from numbers you enter, or quoted from the source named beside it. Nothing on this page is illustrative. This is not legal, tax or financial advice, and reading it does not create a professional relationship.