Case library  /  Sexual boundaries

Coffee three days after the final session

In short

Coffee three days after the final session?

Revocation stayed. Four years of probation

$4,254

An intern who never told his supervisor, “for fear of being fired.” Four years of probation.

License typeLMFT
EffectiveApril 4, 2024
Case number2002021002677

What happened

He treated the client for five months while still an intern. In what became the final session he told the client he had feelings for him. They agreed to end therapy and to meet for coffee three days later.

A romantic and sexual relationship followed and ran for about two years and three months.

He did not consult his clinical supervisor about any of it — the decision records his reason as fear of being fired.

The client later called a crisis line and described feeling “confused, anxious, distracted, worried, and was trying not to cave into pressure or guilt.”

What it was charged as

B&P §4982(d) and (e)

Gross negligence, and violating the chapter and the Board's regulations.

B&P §4982(i)

Recklessly causing emotional harm.

B&P §4982(k)

Sexual relations with a former client within two years of termination.

The outcome

Revocation stayed. Four years of probation.

OAH No. 2023060971

$4,254ordered in cost recovery under B&P §125.3

What the rule actually says

Pre-licensure conduct follows the license. He was an intern when this began and an LMFT when it was charged, and the discipline attached to the license he eventually held. The supervision point is statutory too: §4982(u) makes violating the rules governing the gaining and supervision of experience its own ground for discipline.

Where insurance reaches, and where it does not

An associate covered under an employer's policy is usually not a named insured on it, and the employer has no reason to carry board-defense cover for someone else's registration. This is the single most common coverage gap for California associates, and it is the reason the individual policies start at roughly $35 to $65 a year for a registrant.

Compare what each program actually covers →

What would have changed it

  • The sentence “for fear of being fired” is the whole case. Every supervision relationship should be able to survive the disclosure that a supervisee is having a reaction to a client. If yours cannot, that is a fact about the placement worth acting on before it becomes a fact about your license.
  • Consultation is not just protective clinically. A documented consultation is the single most useful piece of evidence a respondent can bring to a boundary case, and it did not exist here.

Source. This write-up is drawn from the signed public decision in the case number above. Names, cities and employers have been removed — why. To pull the original, open the Board's quarterly newsletter archive, find the issue covering April 4, 2024, and match the case number in the Formal Disciplinary Actions section. Not legal advice.

Figures checked, narrative not re-read

The numbers are current. The argument around them has not been reviewed since it was written.

You should not have to work this part out on your own.

Once a month: free tools and apps worth having, better ways to run the admin side of a practice, what other California therapists are actually doing, and anything new here that might save you an afternoon.

About monthly. One click to leave. Never sold, never shared. The consent box is separate and unticked because California requires it — and because it should be.