Case library · California · 2024–2026

What actually gets a California therapist disciplined

In short

What actually gets a California therapist disciplined?

Thirty real cases, the exact code section each was charged under, and what each one cost

103 decisions read, 30 written up

Every LMFT and AMFT disciplinary decision the Board of Behavioral Sciences published between 2024 and 2026, read in full. Thirty of them are written up here — what happened, which subdivision of §4982 it was charged under, how it resolved, and what it cost. No names. Every case number is given so you can pull the signed decision yourself.

103signed decisions read in full
30written up as case studies
62of 103 cite §4982(a) — a conviction
$15,883the largest cost recovery ordered

The shape of itThe thirty casesWhat it costsInsurance that answers for it

There are no names on this site, and that is deliberate

Every name is public record. The Board publishes them in its own quarterly newsletter and the Department of Consumer Affairs hosts the signed decisions. This site does not republish them, for an editorial reason rather than a legal one: a page that names people becomes a page people arrive at by searching a name, and at that point it has stopped teaching anything.

Nothing has been softened. Conduct, statute, outcome and dollar figure are exactly as each decision states them. Cities, employers and client initials are removed. Every case below carries its case number and effective date.

To verify any case here: open the Board's quarterly newsletter archive at bbs.ca.gov/resources/general.html, find the “Formal Disciplinary Actions” section of the issue covering the effective date, and match the case number. Each licensee name in those PDFs is a live link to the signed Decision and Order.

The shape of it

Discipline does not usually start with a client.

This is the finding that surprises most therapists, and it is not an interpretation — it is the Board's own reporting. In FY 2023–24 more complaints came from government agencies than from members of the public, and the largest single driver of MFT discipline in California is the Department of Justice conviction and arrest feed under Penal Code §11105.2. Sixty-two of the 103 decisions read for this library cite §4982(a), a substantially related conviction. Most of those are a DUI. None of them began with someone complaining about therapy.

FigureWhat it isContext
2,127complaints received by BBS in FY 2023-24across all license types — up from 1,803 three years earlier
1,006of them came from government agenciesmore than the 952 that came from members of the public
47accusations filed that yearout of 2,127 complaints
415days, on average, from complaint to formal disciplineagainst a 540-day target
7malpractice settlement reports in four yearsaveraging $360,000 paid on behalf of the licensee
51%of cases settle219 settled against 210 that went to hearing over four years

Source: the Board's 2025 Sunset Review Report, section 4.

Which subdivision of §4982, and how often

Counted from the text of the 103 decisions. A single case can cite several.

Subd.What it prohibitsCasesNote
(a)Conviction of a substantially related crime62Overwhelmingly the most cited ground. Mostly DUI.
(c)Substance use dangerous to self or others32Almost always paired with (a).
(i)Intentionally or recklessly causing emotional harm13The standard companion count in every boundary case.
(e)Violating the chapter or a Board regulation12The hook that pulls all of 16 CCR into §4982.
(d)Gross negligence or incompetence9Every dual-relationship case.
(k)Sexual misconduct with a client or former client6
(j)A dishonest, corrupt or fraudulent act5
(m)Failure to maintain confidentiality4
(b), (p), (u), (w), (y)Fraud in licensure, advertising, experience hours, child abuse reporting, records access1One case each — and each one is in this library.

The complete subdivision list, (a) through (ab), is in the Board's Statutes and Regulations at article 2.

And what gets cited, short of an accusation

A citation and fine is not formal discipline, and it is far more common. These are the five grounds the Board reports citing most often, in its own order:

  • Failure to complete specific continuing education coursework requirements
  • Failure to maintain patient confidentiality
  • Providing services for which licensure is required — unlicensed practice, or practicing on an expired license
  • Misrepresentation as to the type or status of a license or registration held
  • Misrepresentation as to the completion of continuing education requirements

Two of those five are about continuing education and one is about confidentiality. None of them is clinical.

The library

Thirty cases, grouped by what went wrong.

Each one opens to a full write-up: the facts as the decision states them, every statute charged with a link to the code section, the disposition, the cost recovery, what the rule actually requires, and where a liability policy does and does not reach.

Fitness-to-practice examinations · 1

One page, three cases, one lesson: an order to be examined is not a request, and ignoring it is its own independent ground for revocation with no §4982 charge attached.

The order to be examined is not a requestThree cases, three revocations, and in one of them no §4982 charge at all.LMFTApril 4, 2024Surrendered

What it costs

Cost recovery is the number therapists most underestimate.

Business and Professions Code §125.3 lets an administrative law judge order a licensee found in violation to pay the reasonable costs of investigating and enforcing the case, including the Attorney General's charges. It is separate from your own lawyer, separate from any fine, and no insurance policy sold to therapists pays it. The judge can reduce it. The judge cannot increase it.

OrderedTypical fact pattern
$882 – $2,500A single DUI, settled early
$2,500 – $5,500Multiple convictions, or a settled boundary case
$5,000 – $8,200A contested boundary or dual-relationship case
$7,600 – $12,500Sexual misconduct, or a multi-client business-practice case
$15,883The highest in three years — the residential-facility sexual misconduct case

None of that includes your own defense counsel, the psychological or psychiatric evaluation the order requires you to pay for, the practice-supervision arrangement, the remedial coursework that cannot be counted toward your continuing education, or the income lost during a suspension.

The fifteen probation conditions

These appear in essentially every probation order the Board writes. Two of them are the ones therapists never think about until they are living under them.

ConditionWhat it means in practice
Obey All LawsAny new offense is a violation.
File Quarterly ReportsThe single most commonly missed condition.
Comply With the Probation Program
Interviews With the Board
Failure to Practice / TollingStop practicing and the clock stops, but the obligations do not.
Notify the Board of Any Change of Employment or Residence
Supervision of Unlicensed Persons
Notification to ClientsYou must tell your clients you are on probation.
Notification to EmployerAnd your employer.
Violation of Probation
Maintain a Valid License
Surrender in Lieu of RevocationThe condition the Board invokes when probation fails, without starting a new case.
Coursework Does Not Count Toward CEYou pay for the ordered coursework, and then you pay for your continuing education separately.
Reimbursement of Probation Program CostsRoughly $1,200 a year.
Cost RecoverySeparate from everything above.

The penalty attached to each violation is set out in the Board's Uniform Standards and Disciplinary Guidelines, which is the document the Board uses to price every settlement it offers.

Where insurance actually reaches

Read the thirty cases and the pattern is hard to miss: almost none of them is a malpractice claim. Nobody sued. The Board saw seven malpractice settlement reports in four years, against 2,127 complaints in a single year. The $1,000,000 limit that every therapist shops on is not the number that matters here — the board-defense sublimit is, and depending on the program it is $5,000, $25,000 or $35,000.

  • Board defense is the coverage you are statistically most likely to use, and it is the smallest number on the policy.
  • Sexual misconduct is defense only on every program a California therapist can buy. There is no indemnity, and some policies condition even the defense on the allegation being unfounded.
  • Cost recovery is not a defense cost. No sublimit pays it, on any policy, ever.
  • Probation is entirely uninsured — monitoring fees of roughly $1,200 a year, ordered evaluations, supervised practice, and coursework that does not count toward your CE.
  • Associates are usually not named insureds on an employer's policy, and the employer has no reason to carry board-defense cover for someone else's registration.

Every program a California MFT can buy, with what each publishes and what people report actually paying →

How this library was built. The Board does not publish a browsable list of its decisions. It publishes a quarterly newsletter, and in the “Formal Disciplinary Actions” section of each issue every licensee name is a live hyperlink to the signed Decision and Order, Stipulated Settlement or Accusation hosted by the Department of Consumer Affairs. Eight issues cover July 2023 through March 2026 with no gap. Reading all eight yields 286 disciplinary entries across every BBS license type; 152 are LMFT or AMFT; 104 took effect in 2024, 2025 or 2026. 103 of those 104 source documents were retrieved and read in full — one entry had no hyperlink in the newsletter. Checked August 2026.

Most of these are stipulated settlements. In a stipulated settlement the licensee does not admit the allegations; they agree the Board could establish a prima facie case, and they accept the discipline. Where a case went to a full hearing instead, the case page says so.

This is not legal advice. We are not lawyers. If you are facing a Board matter, the single most useful thing on this page is the observation that a licensing attorney and a criminal defense attorney are different jobs, and that you probably want both. The Board's brochure on therapist sexual misconduct, which §728 requires therapists to provide in certain circumstances, is here.

Figures checked, narrative not re-read

The numbers are current. The argument around them has not been reviewed since it was written.

You should not have to work this part out on your own.

Once a month: free tools and apps worth having, better ways to run the admin side of a practice, what other California therapists are actually doing, and anything new here that might save you an afternoon.

About monthly. One click to leave. Never sold, never shared. The consent box is separate and unticked because California requires it — and because it should be.